I’ve been planning and planning to record my new solo album for seemingly the last 7 years.  I’ve written tons of songs and laid down demos and even released a few of them as singles with videos and everything but, and this is a big but, I haven’t recorded anything that I was certain was for a new album.  I have basically been in a sort of creative limbo.

A few weeks back I thought of a way to finally get the ball rolling.  I went through a bunch of old voice memos, iPad demos, recording sessions, and assorted odds and ends from the last few years and found out that I had dozens of potential tracks for an album if I could just get myself to knuckle down and do the work.  Today I finally started doing the work by tracking the basic tracks for the first song I’ve chosen to work on.  I’ve decided on the sound and artistic direction for the album and given myself a few parameters for recording it that ought to make it an interesting challenge.

Basically, I’ve decided to do something I haven’t done since the 1990’s and track the album on tape.  I will bring the tracks into the computer for mixing and mastering, but I’m doing the actual recording on a 4-track reel-to-reel deck so the album will be what is known as ADD (Analog recording, Digital mixing, Digital mastering).  Why bother with that?  I suppose it’s because arbitrary constraints can make the recording process more interesting and I’m hopeful that the resulting album will have a more cohesive sound if all the instruments are recorded on the same reel-to-reel tape system.  I could use a tape emulation plugin or something but that would violate one of the other constraints I’ve decided on: no digital effects trickery.  I won’t be comping or looping or faking anything, no recording to a grid, I’m just going to play the instruments and sing and if I screw up I will stop and rewind and do the take again until I get it right, just like in the pre-digital days.  Any guitar or vocal effects I want will be part of the original takes, no post-processing plugins.

It has been a very long time since I recorded this way.  It’s extremely primitive, but that’s the idea.  I want the record to represent actual performances as they occurred at a specific point in time.  I don’t want to be second-guessing and tweaking and doubting myself or leaving room to defer decisions about tones or sounds until some future point.  Do the thing, record the thing, move on, that’s the plan.  If there are imperfections, so be it, but the result will be real and it will be physically printed on tape.

Indecision can be one of the enemies of creativity.  Creativity involves inspiration and planning and disciplined execution and it can, of course, involve meticulous editing and revision and alteration to get things exactly perfect, but when recording as a solo artist (as opposed to with a band) it can be fairly easy to wind up with a sterile sounding result because every track is recorded in isolation.  You don’t have the live dynamics happening between yourself and another person that brings humanity into the process.  Removing some of the crutches that you lean on to get a “polished” result is a possible way to bring back a little of the natural feeling to the recordings.  I know that the albums I did in the old days on 4-track cassette were harder to make because of the inherent limitations of the technology and they sounded less refined but more alive.

I’m a much better musician now than I was 25 years ago and I know a lot more about recording.  I also have much higher fidelity equipment so I don’t anticipate this sounding like those old 4-track records, but neither will it sound quite like the pure digital stuff I’ve been tracking since the early aughts.  If I get a result that is coherent and warm and makes the record I hear in my head, the extra work will be worth it.

I expect that tomorrow I will be completing the tracking for the first song and planning the next session.  I think I can finish tracking the record in a couple of weeks once I get going since all the songs are already written.

Today I worked on a new recording of my song “Ostrich” which I released as a video single a few years back.  I laid down vocals, guitars, and bass.  Drums, piano, and one more guitar part will happen tomorrow.  My plan is to keep each song to no more than eight total tracks and a “Let It Be… Naked” level of production complexity so I won’t be going crazy with lots of over-dubs.  The session today took about three hours.  Up next will likely be “Brenda Loves James”, “Flying Through the Frames”, “Mostly Water”, “Never Replace You”, “Monkey Mind”, “Basement Heroes”, “What A Day”, “Because”, “Complicated Animals”, “The Wolf Is At The Door” or any one of a few more that I have written down on a list but can’t recall off the top of my head.  Like I said, I have a pretty big backlog of songs.  The album will wind up weighing in at a dozen songs minimum, probably fourteen if all goes according to plan.  Just because I have a list doesn’t mean I won’t change it up a bit.

I think this is gonna be a good one.  I am feeling the mojo.  🙂

I am not a photographer.  Let’s just get that out of the way first off.  I am a musician, I am a software engineer, I even go so far as to classify myself a writer of sorts, but I have never claimed to be a photographer.  Like sculpture, painting, poetry, screen printing, jewelry making, and the many other forms of artistic creativity available to the interested individual, I have dabbled over the years.  I took some photography classes in high school.  I have shot and edited short films and god knows I’ve taken thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of photographs but I’ve never truly stopped to become informed or deeply involved in the craft.  I’ve been a dilettante at best.  More interested in photography as a way to document my life visually than as an artistic medium.

I’ve owned many cameras over the years, all point and shoot type things.  When I was a kid I had a little 110 Kodak Instamatic with one of those flash cube situations to take snapshots.  Something along these lines:

KODAK AUSTRALASIA POCKET INSTAMATIC 300, BOXED, ADVANCE ISSUE, AS-IS/cks/195409 | eBay

Later on in high school photography class I learned the basics of shooting with a manual 35mm SLR camera (probably a Pentax K1000 or Canon AE-1 or Minolta OM, I really don’t even remember what the school had available to shoot with) and I learned how to develop film and make prints in a darkroom with an enlarger.  While I did enjoy the experience, it wasn’t enough to inspire me to acquire any such gear for myself.  In my 20-something years I owned a variety of 35mm point and shoot rangefinder cameras with which I thoroughly documented the fact that I was alive in the 1990’s.  Then came the early 2000’s and my first couple of digital point and shoot cameras.  No more film developing!  Built in (terrible, lo-res) video!  I had a couple of those and then suddenly the camera on my iPhone 3G or 4 was good enough that I no longer felt the need and that was that.  I was kinda done with cameras.

This changed in perhaps 2013 or 2014 over Christmas when there was some sort of Black Friday deal at the local Wal-Mart for a Nikon D5100 and a couple of lenses for a ridiculously low price.  I had no idea there were only two of them available at the store and blithely went over to buy one, innocent of what a Wal-Mart Black Friday event was all about.  I was lucky enough to be the first person to ask about the camera and after waiting around for an hour or two I was one of two people who walked out with a new Nikon DSLR.  Nice.

This piqued my interest in photography a bit.  The quality of the photos I could get with each successive smartphone camera kept improving and the effects and filtering that were possible with apps got more powerful, but the quality of the image and the fun of using the camera were just somehow different with the Nikon.  I started thinking of it as “the good camera” or “the real camera” and everything else was just snapshots.  Again, not really into Proper Photography enough to know the difference between an F-stop and a bus-stop, but it certainly seemed more capable than even the best smartphone, regardless of the megapixel count.  Probably something to do with the lenses, I figured…

It’s no secret that I love to haunt estate sales, pawn shops, classified ad listings, thrift stores, and the like in search of unloved and inexpensive things that I might find interesting to play with.  I have seen tons of photography equipment float by over the years and the film gear always seemed to be cheap and, to me, not terribly interesting.  Why would I need film, after all?  It’s not as if I ever printed anything.  Hell, back when I took film photographs I rarely even saved the negatives.  However, on a lark I picked up a camera one day at an estate sale listed “AS-IS”.  It was a Nikon F65 35mm SLR with a couple of lenses and it was, I believe, $20.  I didn’t really care about the camera, I just thought that maybe the lenses would work with the digital Nikon D5100 I had been using for a few years.  My phone seemed to indicate that they would work and I grabbed the cam and lenses.  That was probably two years ago.

Another estate sale a few months ago (this one online, but local) and I threw a small bid at a goofy looking old folding camera called a Zeiss Ikonta.  I knew nothing about it but I remembered that Zeiss made good stuff and I thought it looked kinda cool.  Nobody else bid and I got the camera.  It turned out that it used a different film size, 120.  Now I was curious.  Could I learn how to take pictures with this thing?  If so, could I get them developed?  Could I develop them myself?  It sounded like a fun little diversion so down the internet rabbit hole I went.  Sure enough, I could buy the film and with a relatively small investment in some chemistry and basic equipment I could develop it at home.  Fun!

A week or so later and I was off to the races, taking terrible, underexposed, out of focus, badly developed photos and learning as I went.  I went ahead and dusted off the Nikon F65 and threw some film in it and took some pics with that too and scanned in the negatives from both cams.  One or two pics weren’t horrible.  Nice!

What happened next was probably predictable.  Whenever I learn about a new thing and start having fun I get a little obsessive.  A $100 bin full of random darkroom equipment picked up at another estate sale got me almost entire setup for a darkroom (minus the enlarger) and also netted me a couple of cool little sub-miniature spy cameras (including a black Minox B, which is rare and valuable and almost certainly was only in that bin because the sellers had no idea what it was).  Then I got an enlarger from Craigslist and now I’m starting to finally, after decades taking pictures, FINALLY learn enough about photography to be dangerous.  I gotta say, I’m enjoying it.  I’ve shot quite a few rolls of film in the last few weeks and as soon as one missing part arrives for my enlarger I hope to make some prints this weekend.

Here are some initial test images I’ve taken while figuring this stuff out….